This is absolutely ridiculous. The fact that people could actually hold the victim of a terrorist attack accountable for the terrorist attack is sickening. I mean what, did the jury just go "well, we don't have the real criminals here to prosecute, so we'll just punish the victim instead." What's next? Are we going to start prosecuting people whose cars get broken into because they don't have car alarms? Or people whose houses get robbed because they didn't have enough locks on their doors? Or how about people who get injured in a shooting because they weren't wearing bullet proof vests? Those sorts of cases would have just as much legitimacy.

Someone's top 30 hot actress list:

http://rumandmonkey.com/widgets/toys/poprate/index.php?action=view;genre=Hot+actresses

Notice anything unusual? Out of place?

bahahahah

http://bash.org/?564283

It's the war of the hippies!

http://www.wired.com/news/planet/0,2782,69177,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_1